This article is available in: PDF HTML

On the Feasibility of In-Venue Observations of Electronic Gaming Machine Gamblers and Game Characteristics

Jason Landon, Katie Palmer du Preez, Maria Bellringer, Max Abbott, Amanda Roberts

Abstract


Detailed observational studies of undisturbed gambler behaviour in venues are rare, especially when the focus is on continuous gambling such as electronic gaming machines (EGMs). EGMs are the main source of harmful gambling in New Zealand and all EGMs in New Zealand now include a mandatory pop-up message feature. The present study reports on 48 hours of in situ observations of EGM gamblers in casino and non-casino (pub) venues in New Zealand. We sought to establish whether relatively detailed observations of EGM features and gambler behaviour in venues were possible. The EGM feature that we focused on were pop-up messages, given their harm-minimization potential and the relative ease with which they can be observed. However, other EGM features were also documented, along with descriptive accounts of associated gambler behaviour. The results establish that relatively detailed (quantitative or qualitative) observational data can be collected in venues by using smart phones. The data showed that pop-up messages were generally attended to, but had little observable effect on gambler behaviour in venues. Direct in situ observation of gamblers can provide ecologically valid information to complement more common experimental and survey-based approaches. Suggestions are made for developing the procedure.

Les études d’observation détaillée in situ sur le comportement non perturbé de joueurs sont rares, surtout si on met l’accent sur le jeu continu, comme avec les appareils de jeux électroniques. En Nouvelle-Zélande, ces appareils sont la principale source de jeux compulsifs, et tous les appareils dans ce pays incluent dorénavant une fonctionnalité obligatoire de message contextuel. La présente étude fait état de 48 heures d’observation in situ de joueurs sur appareils dans des casinos ou d’autres lieux (bars) en Nouvelle-Zélande, et on a cherché à déterminer s’il était possible de faire des observations relativement détaillées des caractéristiques et du comportement de joueurs dans ces lieux. On a mis l’accent sur la fonctionnalité des messages contextuels pour analyser leur potentiel de diminuer des méfaits et leur relative facilité à les observer. On a aussi consigné d’autres fonctionnalités d’appareils de jeu, ainsi que des comptes-rendus descriptifs du comportement des joueurs associés. Les résultats montrent que l’on peut recueillir des données d’observation in situ relativement détaillées (quantitatives ou qualitatives) à l’aide de téléphones intelligents. Les données montrent que les messages contextuels ont généralement été pris en compte, mais qu’ils ont eu peu d’effet observable sur le comportement des joueurs. L’observation directe de joueurs peut fournir des informations écologiquement valables pour appuyer les approches expérimentales communes par sondage. On y fait aussi quelques suggestions pour mettre en œuvre une procédure.


Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Aasved, M. J., & Schaefer, J. M. (1995). Minnesota slots: An observational study of pull tab gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 11, 311–341.

Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2014). New Zealand 2012 National Gambling Study: Gambling harm and problem gambling: Report number 2. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland University of Technology, Gambling and Addictions Research Centre.

Blaszczynski, A., Gainsbury, S., & Karlov, L. (2014). Blue Gum gaming machine: An evaluation of responsible gaming features. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30, 697–712.

Blaszczynski, A., Sharpe, L., & Walker, M. (2001). The assessment of the impact of the configuration on electronic gaming machines as harm minimisation strategies for problem gambling. A report for the Gaming Industry Operator’s Group. Sydney, Australia: University Printing Service.

Browne, M., Langham, E., Rockloff, M. J., Li, E., Donaldson, P., & Goodwin, B. (2015). EGM jackpots and player behaviour: An in-venue shadowing study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, 1695–1714. doi:10.1007/s10899-014-9485-y

Delfabbro, P., Osborn, A., Nevile, M., Skelt, L., & McMillen, J. (2007). Identifying problem gamblers in gambling venues: A report for the Ministerial Council on Gambling. Victoria, Australia: Gambling Research Australia.

Department of Internal Affairs. (2013). Gambling fact sheet 6: Gambling harm prevention and minimisation. Retrieved from http://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/Files/GamblingFactSheets-Feb2013/$file/FactSheet6-Feb2013.pdf

Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the ‘crack cocaine’ of gambling? Addiction, 100, 33–45.

Fisher, S. (1993). The pull of the fruit machine: A sociological typology of young players. The Sociological Review, 41, 446–474.

Fong, L. H. N., Law, R., & Lam, D. (2014). An examination of factors driving Chinese gamblers: Fallacy bias. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30, 757–770.

Fong, L. H. N., So., A. S. I., & Law, R. (2016). Betting decision under streak-break pattern: Evidence from casino gaming. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32, 171–185. doi:10.1007/s10899-015-9550-1

Griffiths, M. (1991). The observational study of adolescent gambling in UK amusement arcades. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 309–320.

Griffiths, M. D. (2009). Minimizing harm from gambling: What is the gambling industry's role? Addiction, 104, 696–697.

Griffiths, M. D. (2011). A typology of UK slot machine gamblers: A longitudinal observational and interview study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 9, 606–626.

Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. (2009). PAR sheets, probabilities, and slot machine play: Implications for problem and non-problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues, 23, 81–110.

Harrigan, K., Dixon, M., & Brown, D. (2015). Modern multi-line slot machine games: The effect of lines wagered on winners, losers, bonuses, and losses disguised as wins. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, 423–439.

Ladouceur, R., & Sevigny, S. (2003). Interactive messages on video lottery terminals and persistence in gambling. Gambling Research: Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies (Australia), 15, 45–50.

Landon, J., Palmer du Preez, K., Bellringer, M., Page, A., & Abbott, M. (2016). Pop-up messages on electronic gaming machines in New Zealand: Experiences and views of gamblers and venue staff. International Gambling Studies, 16, 49–66. doi:10.1080/14459795.2015.1093535

Livingstone, C., Woolley, R., Zazryn, T., Bakacs, L., & Shami, R. (2008). The relevance and role of gaming machine games and game features on the play of problem gamblers. Report for Independent Gambling Authority, South Australia. Adelaide SA: IGA.

Ministry of Health. (2016). Intervention client data. Retrieved from http://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/mental-health-and-addictions/problem-gambling/service-user-data/intervention-client-data#ppgm

Monaghan, S. (2008). Review of pop-up messages on electronic gaming machines as a proposed responsible gambling strategy. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 214–222.

Monaghan, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Impact of mode of display and message content of responsible gambling signs for electronic gaming machines on regular gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 67–88.

Palmer du Preez, K., Landon, J., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Abbott, M. (2016). The effects of pop-up harm minimisation messages on electronic gaming machine gambling behaviour in New Zealand. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32, 1115–1126. doi:10.1007/s10899-016-9603-0

Parke, A., & Griffiths, M. (2004). Aggressive behaviour in slot machine gamblers: A preliminary observational study. Psychological Reports, 95, 109–114.

Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling (Report no. 50). Canberra, Australia: Author.

QSR International. (2013). NVivo Qualitative Analysis Software (Version 10).

Schellink, T., & Schrans, T. (2002). Atlantic Lottery Corporation video lottery responsible gaming feature research: Final report. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Focal Research.

Tse S., Stevenson R. E., Shepherd R.-M., Adams P., McArthur M.-J., Rossen F., Townsend, S. (2005). Host responsibility: Best practice guidelines for gambling venues in New Zealand: Interim report, phase 1. Auckland: University of Auckland, Centre for Gambling Studies.

Wohl, M. J., Gainsbury, S., Stewart, M. J., & Sztainert, T. (2013). Facilitating responsible gambling: The relative effectiveness of education-based animation and monetary limit setting pop-up messages among electronic gaming machine players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29, 703–717.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4309/jgi.v0i36.3982

Copyright © 2017 | Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Editor-in-chief: Sherry Stewart, Ph.D.
Managing Editor: Vivien Rekkas, Ph.D. (contact)