L’illusion de contrôle liée au jeu auprès d’universitaires : le bénéfice du doute? / The Illusion of Control in Gambling among University Students: The Benefit of the Doubt?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2019.42.6Keywords:
illusion de contrôle, optimisme, lieu de contrôle, statistiques, probabilités, conviction, doute, universitaires, jeux de hasard et d’argent, illusion of control, optimism, locus of control, probabilities, doubt, students, gamblingAbstract
Since previous research has indicated that high levels of education might protect against gambling problems, studies have tested the hypothesis that academics have fewer erroneous thoughts related to gambling, such as the illusion of control (i.e., the overestimation of the contribution of personal skill in gambling outcomes). However, the results of these studies were equivocal. The illusion of control can, however, be fostered by various sociodemographic, dispositional, and cognitive factors that may be present in highly educated individuals, including degree of optimism, internal of the locus of control, knowledge of statistics and probabilities (SP) and, finally, the degree of conviction about gambling beliefs. Indeed, it has been shown that pathological gamblers not only have more irrational thoughts, but they also tend to be more convinced of the correctness of these thoughts. For example, an individual might think that a lucky charm might help them win, but not be too sure how right they are to hold this belief (low degree of conviction). On the contrary, a person might be convinced that lucky charms definitely help them win, or definitely do not help them win (both of which are examples of a high degree of conviction). Based on data previously collected by Smith and Giroux (2018) investigating the gambling behavior of 142 university students with and without SP knowledge, this study examines the relationships between the illusion of control in gambling and factors known to influence the illusion of control. Secondly, this article seeks to verify the predictive potential of these individual variables on the illusion of control. The results indicate that a high level of SP knowledge is associated with a higher degree of optimism (p <.01), as well as fewer superstitions (p <.01). Moreover, the less university students are convinced of the rightness of their beliefs, the more they report an illusion of control (p <.01). Within this sample, being a man, having little SP knowledge and a low degree of conviction statistically predict more illusion of control (p <.01). The discussion explores how doubt can be beneficial for educated individuals who engage in such erroneous thinking.
Résumé
Puisque la recherche antérieure a indiqué que de hauts niveaux d’éducation pourraient protéger contre les problèmes de jeu, des études ont testé l’hypothèse selon laquelle les universitaires entretiennent moins de pensées erronées liées aux jeux de hasard et d’argent (JHA), telle l’illusion de contrôle qui consiste à surestimer l’apport de l’habileté personnelle dans les résultats du jeu. Or, les résultats de ces études ont été équivoques. L’illusion de contrôle peut toutefois être favorisée par différents facteurs sociodémographiques, dispositionnels et cognitifs que peuvent présenter des individus fortement scolarisés, soit le degré d’optimisme, l’internalité du lieu de contrôle, les connaissances des statistiques et des probabilités (SP) et, finalement, le degré de conviction quant aux croyances liées au jeu. En effet, il a été démontré que les joueurs pathologiques ont non seulement plus de pensées erronées, mais ils tendent également à être davantage convaincus de la justesse de ces croyances. Ainsi, quelqu’un pourrait endosser un certain nombre de pensées erronées, mais exprimer du doute quant à la justesse de celles-ci. Par exemple, quelqu’un pourrait penser qu’un porte-bonheur aidera (un peu, modérément, beaucoup) à gagner, mais ne pas être certain d’avoir raison à ce sujet. Contrairement, une personne pourrait être persuadée (haut degré de conviction) que les porte-bonheurs aident ou n’aident pas. S’appuyant sur les données préalablement recueillies par Smith et Giroux (2018) pour une étude sur les comportements de jeu de 142 universitaires avec ou sans connaissances des statistiques et des probabilités (SP), la présente étude examine les relations entre l’illusion de contrôle liée aux JHA et ces facteurs connus pour influencer l’illusion de contrôle. Deuxièmement, cet article cherche à vérifier le potentiel prédictif de ces variables individuelles sur l’illusion de contrôle. Les résultats indiquent qu’un niveau élevé de connaissances des SP est associé à un degré supérieur d’optimisme (p < .01), ainsi qu’à moins de superstitions (p < .01). De plus, moins les universitaires sont convaincus quant à leurs croyances, plus ils rapportent d’illusion de contrôle (p < .01). Au sein de cet échantillon, le fait d’être un homme, d’avoir peu de connaissances des SP ainsi qu’un degré de conviction peu élevé prédisent statistiquement plus d'illusion de contrôle (p < .01). La discussion porte sur les avantages possibles de la présence de doute auprès d’individus scolarisés faisant état de ce type de pensées erronées.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Journal Contributors Agreement
The parties intending to be legally bound (the principal author [Author] and the Journal of Gambling Issues [Publisher]), agree as follows:
1. The Author grants exclusively to the Publisher all world-wide rights in this Contribution; including the full copyright therein, the right to publish it as part of the JGI in all forms, languages and media now or hereafter known or developed and including, but not limited to, the right to license subsidiary rights such as granting rights to reprint in anthologies issued by other publishers or to photocopy for classroom use.
2. The Author guarantees that he or she is the sole owner of the Contribution and has full authority to make this agreement; and that the Contribution does not contain any copyright; does not violate any other property rights; does not contain any scandalous, libelous or unlawful matter; does not make any improper invasion of the privacy of another person; and has not been published before, and is not now being considered for publication elsewhere.
If the Contribution has been published previously, the Author guarantees that permission has been obtained, and any fee required has been paid, for publication in the JGI and shall submit proof of such permission and any required credit line to the Publisher with the signed agreement. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Publisher against any claim or proceeding undertaken on any of the aforementioned grounds.
3. The Author shall allow the Editor of the JGI and the Publisher to make the Contribution conform to the style of presentation, spelling, capitalization, punctuation and usage followed by the JGI. The Author agrees to review and correct the copyedited manuscript and proofs and to return them to the editor by the date set by the Editor. If the Editor has not received them by that time, the Author agrees that production of the JGI in which the Contribution is to be included may proceed without waiting for the Author's approval of the manuscript or the proofs.
4. If the Author wishes to publish this Contribution elsewhere, the Publisher shall grant to the Author, for no fee, a nonexclusive License to republish the Contribution in the same form in any language in a book or other media written or edited by the Author after the issue of the JGI containing the Contribution has been published, subject only to the conditions that a credit line, to be supplied by the Publisher, will be printed in the Author's book: to indicate the first publication of the Contribution in the JGI. The Author shall inform the Publisher 30 days before the Contribution is released in any other form.
5. This agreement shall be construed and interpreted through the laws of the province of Ontario, Canada. This agreement shall be binding upon and operate to the benefit of the parties thereto, their heirs, successors, assigns, and personal representatives. Where the Contribution is the product of more than one person, all of the obligations of the Author hereby created shall be deemed to be the joint and several obligations of all such persons as testified by their signatures.
6. The Author shall receive no payment from the Publisher for use of the Contribution.
7. The Author agrees to reference this article using its full and accurate name: Journal of Gambling Issues.
